Material on this page is copyright © 2016 John W.F. Waldron

Kinematics: Plate movement

Introduction

Actualism is the idea that features in the rock record are to be explained by looking at the present-day world. It's common in sedimentary courses to use the 'present as the key to the past'.

In courses on structural and metamorphic processes, it has historically been difficult to apply an actualistic approach, because at present the processes are occurring deep beneath the surface. This has changed in recent years. GPS systems enable us to measure plate movement and the distortion of the lithosphere; geophysical investigations allow us to infer the physical state of deep crustal and mantle rocks.

This course takes an actualistic approach to deformation. We look first at plate kinematics to determine the rates and types of deformation that might be occurring at the present day. We will use this as a framework for interpreting the past.

Major subdivisions of the Earth

By composition

Based on seismic velocity: When an earthquake occurs, seismic waves are picked up around the Earth. The timing of arrival of the waves can be used to deduce where within the Earth those waves are refracted and reflected, giving basic information on the location of major boundaries within the Earth. These major boundaries were established in the 1950s, before the nature of rheological constrasts was fully understood.

Core

Outer core

Starts 2900 km below the Earth's surface. The outer surface of the core marked by

Seismic and magnetic properties, taken together, indicate that the core consists mainly of liquid metal.

Inner core

Mantle

Crust

Moho

The base of the crust is marked by a major seismic velocity discontinuity - the Mohorovicic discontinuity or Moho.

Composition

The crust is the most varied part of the Earth compositionally, as a result of 4.5 Ga of the rock cycle.

Two overall types...

Oceanic crust

Oceanic crust is predominantly mafic in composition. The crust is 5-10 km thick and is constantly being recycled by plate tectonic processes. The oldest oceanic crust is probably about 200 Ma.

Within the generally oceanic crust there are some variations, however.

Continental crust

Continental crust is enormously variable in composition and structure. Some broad groupings exist:

By Rheology

As plate tectonics developed in the late 20th century, it was realized that the S-wave attenuation showed that portions of the upper mantle were close to their melting point, and could therefore flow easily.

Asthenosphere

Lithosphere

Thickness

More rigid outer shell of the Earth, composed of

(It is unfortunate that the term 'crust' - which in popular usage means a strong and brittle outer layer - was applied to a compositional layer before plate tectonics was discovered. In the popular imagination it is the crust that is divided into plates, not the lithosphere. Structural geologists must avoid this trap!)

Lithospheric plates

Plate tectonics in its basic form is an idealized version of lithosphere kinematics that uses translation and rotation of plates to explain many observations of tectonic activity. Distortion and dilation are assumed to be restricted to very narrow plate boundaries of three types:

Structural observations and GPS data show that some plate boundaries, expecially on the continents, are actually zones of distortion, hundreds of kilometres wide.

Isostasy

Vertical movements of the lithosphere are largely controlled by density, which can be estimated from gravity data.

These observations lead to the idea of isostasy. Isostatic compensation of two areas means that if you calculate the mass of two typical columns of rock, extending from the surface to the asthenosphere (with unit cross-sectional area) the two masses will be the same.

Some generalizations about isostasy and the lithosphere:

Measuring plate movement

Slip vectors

Slip vector describes the relative movement between two plates at a given point (e.g. the movement on the San Andreas Fault Zone at San Francisco).

Several lines of information are available for determining slip vectors. All are limited in one way or another, but together they can be combined to give a reasonable picture of plate movement as it occurs at the present day.

Magnetic information

Paleomagnetism

Remanent magnetism is magnetism preserved by rocks from early in their history. In ideal cases remanent magnetism preserves the orientation of the Earth's magnetic field at the time of formation of the rock.

Apparent pole position is a good way of plotting this information

Apparent polar wander path is obtained if multiple paleomagnetic results of different ages are available for a single continent. Of course, in most cases it's the continent that actually wandered, not the pole. However, true polar wander (controversial!) may have occurred at some times in Earth history and may complicate the picture.

This method is almost the only way to get information on plate movements before 200 Ma. Its major limitation is that it gives only paleolatitude and not paleolongitude, so E-W movements are not measureable. Typically the rates of movement deduced from paleomagnetic studies are averaged over tens to hundreds of Myr.

Linear magnetic anomalies

Magnetic surveys over many areas of the ocean floor show patterns of linear magnetic anomalies. Positive anomalies are strips where the magnetic field is slightly stronger than the average value for that part of the Earth's surface. Negative anomalies have a weaker field.

Pattern of oceanic magnetic anomalies
Calculating slip rates

v= w/t

Seismic information

Neotectonics is the study of the kinematics & dynamics of active faults. Typically, neotectonics can provide good information on the direction of slip at all three types of plate boundary but provides little information on the rate of slip.

Elastic deformation prior to fault slip

The following relates to an idealized E-W transform fault with dextral motion (diagram to be drawn in class).

Of course, for a sinstral fault, or one with dip-slip motion, the directions will be different. Note also that the actual elastic strains occurring in rocks are exceedingly small.

Failure

Focal mechanisms

At the instant of earthquake, the rocks abruptly return to their 'normal' state. The first motion of particles determines the nature of the first seismic wave that propagates from the focus.

Example focal mechanism
General focal mechanism

Early focal mechanism diagrams were constructed laboriously by hand. Now, when a major earthquake occurs, computer programs in major seismic centres automatically produce focal mechanism diagrams, typically within a few minutes of the event. Focal mechanisms for recent events can be consulted at the US National Earthquake Information Centre.

Plate motion from focal mechanisms

Limitations

Direct measurement by GPS etc.

The global positioning system (GPS) depends on a set of satellites orbiting earth, which transmit signals to receivers on Earth. The receivers can locate themselves very precisely in space, with an accuracy of centimetres or millimetres if the devices are run over a long period of time, or sites are reoccupied at intervals of months or years.

Overall conclusions of slip-vector determinations

Plate kinematics

Kinematics of triple junctions

Triple junctions are places where three plates (and three boundaries) meet. For example, at a ridge-ridge-ridge junction all the plates are separating, and all three are moving relative to the junction itself. How do we calculate the velocity of the junction itself?

Example: RRR Junction in Indian ocean

To do this we plot motions in 2D velocity space. For this purpose we typically assume the Earth is flat! This is actually reasonable for the small area (<500 km) around a triple junction.) For three plates A, B, C that meet at a triple junction we can say that

AVB + BVC + CVA = 0

Hence we can plot the 3 vectors nose to tail as a velocity triangle.

What about the velocity of the junction itself. For the RRR triple junction we can plot a bisector (dashed line) of each side of the triangle. The bisector represents the possible locus of the triple junction based on that pair of plates, assuming that spreading is orthogonal and symmetrical. The three bisectors meet at a point that represents the motion of the triple junction itself.

Example TFR Junction off Vancouver Is.

Now let's look at a trench-transform-ridge triple junction located just off the north tip of Vancouver Island. This is the junction between the Queen Charlotte Islands fault (a dextral transform fault), the Juan da Fuca Ridge, and the Cascadia Subduction zone.

The relative motions are as follows

  Motion on QCI fault motion of JF ridge motion on Cascadia trench
rate 44.35 55.10 46.60
direction -16.23 109.18 58.31

 

Note, in plotting the triple junction, the constraint lines work as follows

Summary of velocity space vector diagrams
All possible triple junctions

These principles can be extended to all possible triple junctions

The triple junction is unstable if the three constraint lines do not meet in a point; then the triple junction must evolve immediately into a new configuration.

Kinematics of plate motion on a sphere

Plate rotation vectors

Euler (pronounced Oiler) showed that the motion of any rigid body on the surface of a sphere can be represented by a rotation about an axis - the point where the axis intersects the Earth's surface is the Euler pole (actually there are two on opposite sides of the Earth)

For every pair of plates, their relative motion is defined by

So it's a vector quantity:

AΩBmeans "rotation vector of B relative to A"

[Note: some texts use the opposite convention, notably the text by Van der Pluijm and Marshak, formerly used in this course]

Calculating slip vectors

Velocity at a point on a boundary depends on

v= ωrsinθ

or in vector terms

AVB = AΩB x r

In this equation

AvB means "velocity of B relative to A at the Earth's surface" (also known as the slip vector)

AΩB means "rotation vector of B relative to A"

r is the radius vector of the Earth through the point on the plate boundary, and x signifies the vector cross product.

Global plate velocities

Euler poles and rotation vectors are related in 3D by the following equation

AΩB + BΩC + CΩA = 0

By matching this result to observations of plate velocity vectors it has proven possible to come up with an internally consistent set of plate rotation vectors that fits the observations well; actually there are several different versions, but they are generally similar.

Evolution of Western Margin of N. America

Engebretson et al. (1985) were able to use poles of rotation and analysis of triple junctions to set up a framework of plate motion along western North America since the early Cretaceous

slab windowOne interesting consequence of this type of modelling is the concept of slab windows: as a ridge is subducted, the two subducted plates on either side of it presumably continue to diverge. This potentially creates a gap in the overlying volcanic arc, and possibly a place where upwelling asthenosphere affects the overriding plate.

Dynamics of plate motion

Plate tectonics as originally defined was a purely kinematic theory, without attention to determining either the absolute motions or the forces that drive plates.

Absolute motion of the plates

Reference frame? In describing the motion of any plate we always have to say what is our reference frame. Is any one reference frame better than any other?

Hotspots are magma sources that appear to be connected to phenomena deep within the mantle and therefore provide an opportunity torelate plate motion to something deeper down. However, attempts to relate plate movements to a hotspot frame of reference have only been partially successful. It seems that the hotspots are moving relative to each other.

Alternatively, a no net rotation frame of reference is often used. This is a frame of reference in which the sum of the rotations of all the plates (when weighted for varying plate areas) is zero.

Forces on the plates

What can we say about the processes that drive the plates.

Convection in a broad sense is the only set of forces capable of driving plate tectonics.

Convection is the circulation of material due to thermal density variations under the influence of gravity. The density contrasts could be within the plates themselves or in the underlying mantle. Some of these forces can be estimated.

List of plate-driving forces.

Of these forces it is clear that the first two have the primary role in driving the plates. Trench suction adds a smaller but significant extra component. Most of the other forces listed above probably act mainly so as to resist plate motion but they are more difficult to quantify.

Overall style of convection

There has been controversy over the style of convection. Some geophysicists have suggested that the convection cells that drive the plates extend no deeper than the 700 km base of the mantle transition zone. This is the deepest point at which the subduction slabs can be detected from earthquakes. Below this, in 2-layer models, it is possible that another set of convection cells operate.

Other geophycisists and modellers prefer to explain plate convection in a whole mantle circulation model.