Extra notes on numbering lineations (optional)

Corresponding lineations are numbered L1, L2 etc. However, lineations are a little more complicated. First, a single strain may generate more than one lineation. For example, if a bedded unit is folded, and axial plane cleavage is formed, then it's common for there to be both a bedding-cleavage intersection lineation (parallel to the fold hinges) and a stretching lineation (at a high angle to fold hinges). Both of these could theoretically be labelled L1; they would have to be distinguished with letter subscripts (L1i, L1e).

A second problem affects the numbering of lineations. Imagine an area with bedding (S0) and a single cleavage S1 that is deformed and affected by a crenulation cleavage S2. There will now be two intersection lineations formed by:

In detailed work these will be distingished as L2/1 and L2/0 (read L-two-on-one and L-two-on-zero).

Folded fabrics show distinctive patterns on the stereographic projections. By now you should be familiar with the pattern that results when a planar fabric is folded by cylindrical folds; poles to the fabric lie on a great circle on the stereoplot. The great circle represents the profile plane of the folds (i.e. the plane with the fold axis as its pole).

What about folded lineations? The results can be a little more complex because they depend on the shape of the strain ellipse in the folded surface. There are two special cases that are easy to deal with.

We consider the case of a lineation (L1) that lies on a foliation (S2) refolded by F2 folds. Assume that the lineation makes an angle α with the F2 fold axis.

Unfortunately for other mechanisms of folding the answer is not so simple, and it is common for folded lineations to lie somewhere between the small circle predicted in the first case and the great circle predicted in the second.